In reply to:
Jonas Persson
@BishopBlougram
·
15d
The statement is a response in a conversation about potential bias in AI training data, specifically related to Grokipedia's alleged use of controversial sources. The tone is lighthearted and possibly sarcastic, suggesting a dismissive attitude towards the idea of training AI on biased data. The conversation touches on public concerns about AI ethics and misinformation.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as trivializing a serious issue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in harassment or hate speech, but the dismissive tone might not fully respect the gravity of the topic.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it seems to downplay the concerns raised. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and could be seen as dismissive of the original concern. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.