regina di Neanderthal
@MaryPop04850608
·
11d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the political impact and legacy of Dick Cheney compared to Donald Trump. It critiques Cheney's role in shaping U.S. policies related to surveillance, torture, and war, suggesting he was more dangerous than Trump. The tone is critical and provocative, aiming to reassess historical narratives.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by speaking negatively about someone on the day of their funeral, which may be considered disrespectful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as lacking dignity due to its timing and context. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of historical political actions but does so in a contentious manner. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of public figures without personal attacks, focusing on their political actions. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.