The statement by @mtaibbi constitutes public discourse as it engages with significant public issues such as police brutality, drone assassinations, wars, prison abuses, immigration enforcement, healthcare, and economic disparities. The tone is defensive, aiming to counter an accusation of selective concern for human rights abuses.
- The statement does not directly harm others but is defensive in nature, aiming to clarify the speaker's stance on human rights issues.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on the speaker's professional history rather than attacking the accuser personally. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by highlighting the speaker's long-term engagement with various human rights issues, though it is more defensive than empathetic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the accusation with evidence of past work, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.