Scott A Martin
@rikolas_sanchez
·
10d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the public issue of media reporting and the potential parallels between the Jeffrey Epstein story and the Russiagate investigation. The tone is analytical and skeptical, aiming to caution against jumping to conclusions without sufficient evidence.
- The statement strives to do no harm by urging caution and avoiding unfounded conclusions, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging a careful examination of evidence, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the evidence without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a reasoned public dialogue, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.