Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/20/2025, 10:37:03 PM
X
In reply to:
Goat
@shirashiranai
·
14d
@GaryMarcus @seconds_0 Why are you arguing with Twitter users? Just go win the case! It’s a slam dunk! We would all be so owned when you post the decision on Twitter. Just imagine it!
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
14d
@seconds_0 you aren’t a good reader but you are preparing me well for possible defenses based in erroneous defense. again i thank you
0.005 Seconds (3/694)
@seconds_0
·
14d
Mr. Marcus assumes Canadian libel law is enforceable in the United States. The US has deigned to not only ignore foreign courts rulings, but actually make laws specifically preventing domestic courts from caring.

Whine elsewhere.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/11…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
14d
@seconds_0 did you not read that i live in (and read the libel in) Canada? 🙄

that ain’t gonna save your bro, sorry.

The conversation involves a discussion about legal jurisdiction and libel laws between Canada and the United States. The tone is somewhat confrontational and sarcastic, with participants challenging each other's understanding of the law. The statement 'because you guys are strengthen my case. it’s judo, my friend.' suggests a strategic approach to the argument, likening it to a judo move, which implies using the opponent's actions to one's advantage.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a contentious exchange.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects privacy but includes sarcasm and mild confrontation. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue is not constructive and includes personal attacks and sarcasm. [-1]