Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
@RepRashida
·
32d
The statement is a serious accusation against the Israeli government, alleging genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. It calls for the United States to recognize this and take action, specifically through a resolution. The tone is urgent and accusatory, aiming to prompt political action and international intervention.
- The statement could be seen as harmful if it inflames tensions or spreads misinformation without evidence, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech directly, but the strong language could be perceived as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses accusatory language without fostering dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a strong accusation without inviting discussion or presenting evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a political stance, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment if the claims are substantiated. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses a platform to address a significant public issue, but the responsibility and integrity depend on the accuracy and evidence of the claims. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.