Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement speculates on the competitive dynamics between Google and OpenAI, suggesting a potential shift in market power. It uses a dramatic tone, implying a significant impact on OpenAI due to Google's advancements. The statement reflects on the financial stability of OpenAI, hinting at vulnerability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but implies a negative outcome for OpenAI, which could be seen as speculative rather than harmful.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on a competitive narrative without considering broader impacts. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead presenting a one-sided view of the situation. [-1]