Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement expresses concern over a draft executive order on AI policy, suggesting it could have negative implications for privacy, vulnerable populations, and AI alignment. It highlights bipartisan rejection and potential long-term consequences, aiming to provoke public scrutiny and debate.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by warning about potential negative outcomes of the executive order. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on policy implications rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by raising awareness of the potential risks associated with the executive order. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by addressing the policy's potential flaws without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.