In reply to:
Art Keller
@ArtKeller
·
14d
The statement 'overstated but directionally correct' is a response to a critical comment about OpenAI's business practices and potential financial instability. The tone is somewhat dismissive but acknowledges a kernel of truth in the criticism. The conversation involves public discourse as it discusses the business strategies and potential outcomes for major AI companies, which are significant public interest topics.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive, which might not promote constructive dialogue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as dismissive of the original critique, which might not fully respect the dignity of the original commenter.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not promote constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.