In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
33d
The statement addresses a public issue by discussing a protest event and its implications, specifically focusing on the interpretation of a chant and its perceived threat to a community. The tone is accusatory and dismissive of alternative interpretations, suggesting a strong stance against the protest's message.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by escalating tensions and fear, rather than seeking to de-escalate or understand the situation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct hate speech but implies a negative characterization of the protestors, which could be seen as disrespectful to their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses alternative interpretations and focuses on a negative perspective. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it dismisses opposing views as 'gaslighting' and 'bullshit', which could be seen as a form of personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.