In reply to:
Leonardo
@BangTheClose
·
33d
The statement engages in a contentious debate about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, specifically addressing the issue of settlements and the legitimacy of Israel. The tone is defensive and dismissive, suggesting that the event in question is unrelated to settlements and criticizing opposing views as propaganda. The mention of historical figures seems intended to undermine the opposing argument's legitimacy.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses opposing views as propaganda, which could exacerbate tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it labels opposing views as propaganda without engaging constructively. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses opposing views rather than engaging with them. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses opposing views without addressing their substance. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.