Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 83

Reposted by Gary Marcus

This is potentially even more evidence that further pushes @GaryMarcus’s assessment that there is a bubble, into the spotlight! If AI companies are raising money based on user counts, token volume, and revenue but it’s all actually one customer (a nation state actor) or a handful

Matan Grinberg

@matanSF

14d

Turns out the explosion in user count that many AI startups have recently been seeing may be hiding something nefarious:

Large-scale, state-sponsored and AI-powered fraud and abuse. Capitalizing on the VC-subsidized token-reselling.

See how we used Droids to fight back:

11/21/2025, 1:08:10 PM

The statement discusses potential fraudulent activities in AI startups, suggesting that user metrics may be inflated by state-sponsored actions. It highlights concerns about transparency and integrity in AI company valuations.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement raises awareness about potential harm caused by fraudulent activities, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By bringing attention to possible fraud, it promotes understanding and vigilance in the AI industry. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the validity of AI startups' metrics without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
It uses its platform to highlight issues that could impact societal trust in AI technologies. [+1]