The statement reflects a defensive tone and addresses a public issue related to the perception and future of generative AI and large language models (LLMs). It suggests a critique of those who disagreed with the speaker's opinion on the matter, implying a broader discussion on the technological and societal implications of AI.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative judgment on those who disagreed, which could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of others by labeling them as 'trolls.' [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses opposing views without engaging with them substantively. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.