In reply to:
daledwayer
@daledwayer
·
4d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about potential unconstitutional actions and military interventions by the U.S. government, specifically regarding militarization in American cities and a possible invasion of Venezuela without Congressional approval.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language to highlight perceived illegal actions, which could be seen as inflammatory.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does accuse the President of illegal actions, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes strong accusations without engaging with opposing views constructively. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by addressing public concerns about government actions, but it could be more responsible by providing evidence or engaging in a more balanced discussion.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.