Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
Caitlin Huey-Burns
@CHueyBurns
·
1d
The statement discusses a political figure's opinion on another political figure, potentially influencing public perception and political discourse. It touches on the dynamics within a political party and the portrayal of a political figure, which are relevant to public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could contribute to political polarization.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on political strategy rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not foster constructive criticism or dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement could influence public perception and political discourse, but it does not clearly aim for societal betterment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles but does not demonstrate responsible use of the platform to foster constructive dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.