Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/22/2025, 10:14:56 PM
X
In reply to:
Geoffrey Miller
@primalpoly
·
10d
@GaryMarcus @eli_lifland Someday, Gary, I aim to convince you that there is no possible path towards AGI/ASI that would be 'safe' in the sense of 'plays nice with humanity for many generations'.

In fact, it's utterly baffling to me that any serious person could think that any agentic AGI/ASIs capable of
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
10d
In many ways aside from the word “soon”, this AI timeline analysis from @eli_lifland is actually very similar to my own take.

• Absolutely agree that AGI and ASI will eventually be built and will be wildly transformative

• Absolutely agree that we are not ready for it.

My
Eli Lifland
@eli_lifland
·
11d
We’re highly confident that:
a) AGI and ASI will eventually be built and might be built soon.
b) ASI will be wildly transformative.
c) We’re not ready for AGI and should be devoting much more attention to preparing for it.

We’re **not** highly confident that:
1) AGI will arrive

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the development and implications of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and ASI (Artificial Superintelligence). It acknowledges the potential risks associated with these technologies and the importance of establishing stable constraints to ensure safety. The tone is collaborative and open to further dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement acknowledges potential harm and the need for safety measures, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by agreeing on the importance of safety and expressing willingness to discuss further. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages constructively with differing views, showing openness to dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]