Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 83

-6

@alfcnz because you persist and because a large number of your followers have in fact already clarified that your target was me, you should maybe read this. (the same holds where i live.)

you and your followers are making a series of very bad choices.

11/23/2025, 6:39:57 PM

In reply to:

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

12d

@alfcnz this is defamatory and demonstrably false. you should take it down and apologize.

Alfredo Canziani

@alfcnz

13d

Wild how a clown who has never trained a neural net feels entitled to criticise an expert who dedicated his life to pushing this field forward while also teaching all the non-obvious details to newcomers.

The statement involves a dispute over potentially defamatory content, with one party accusing another of making false and harmful statements. The inclusion of an image about libel laws suggests a legal dimension to the conflict.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement suggests harm through defamation, indicating a violation of the principle to do no harm. [-2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The accusation of defamation and the mention of followers making bad choices could imply a lack of respect for privacy and dignity. [-2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement lacks constructive dialogue and instead focuses on accusations, which may escalate the conflict. [-2]