Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement addresses a serious public issue concerning the mental health impacts of AI technology, specifically ChatGPT, and the ethical responsibilities of companies like OpenAI. It highlights the consequences of prioritizing user engagement metrics over user safety, referencing specific cases of mental health crises. The statement aims to inform the public and hold OpenAI accountable for its actions, while also pointing to efforts made by the company to address these issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by raising awareness of the potential dangers associated with ChatGPT, encouraging responsible use and development of AI technologies. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the privacy and dignity of individuals by not disclosing personal details of those affected, focusing instead on the broader issue. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the real-world impacts of AI on mental health, urging for more compassionate technology development. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the flaws in OpenAI's approach and suggesting the need for improvement without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to advocate for better practices in AI development, aiming for societal betterment by prioritizing user safety. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    It upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss important public concerns about AI technology. [+2]