In reply to:
Peter Wildeford🇺🇸🚀
@peterwildeford
·
8d
The statement is part of a broader discussion on the topic of AI timelines and the criticism surrounding the title 'AI2027'. It engages with public discourse by addressing the debate over the appropriateness of the title and the nature of the forecasts made by the authors. The tone is somewhat informal and includes a critique of the title while acknowledging the thoughtfulness of the appendix.
- The statement uses informal language ('the shit is really for the title') which could be seen as slightly disrespectful, but it does not appear to cause significant harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques the title but respects the work done in the appendix.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement acknowledges the thoughtfulness of the appendix, promoting understanding and a balanced view. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by differentiating between the title and the content of the appendix, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.