In reply to:
Shaun Schneider
@Shaun_Schneider
·
2d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
The statement critiques a policy decision related to tax breaks and government spending, engaging in a broader discussion about fiscal responsibility and economic policy.
- The statement does not use harmful language but critiques a policy decision, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on policy rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does engage in a policy critique.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a policy decision without personal attacks, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to discuss economic policy, contributing to public discourse on fiscal responsibility. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly critiquing a policy decision. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.