Reposted by Gary Marcus
Garrison Lovely
@GarrisonLovely
·
8d
The statement and related conversations engage in public discourse by discussing the political activities and influence of OpenAI and its associates, particularly in relation to AI regulation. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting bad-faith actions and misinformation by those involved.
- The statement and conversations use strong language and accusations, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The discussions involve accusations and potentially disrespectful language, which may not fully respect the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement raises awareness about political activities, which could promote understanding, but the accusatory tone may hinder empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be seen as personal attacks rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.