Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
-7
The statement and conversation involve a critique of individuals using the 'Dr.' title without being medical doctors. The tone is dismissive and critical, particularly towards those with PhDs who use the title. The conversation touches on issues of respect and recognition for academic achievements.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by dismissing the hard work and achievements of those with PhDs. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks respect for the dignity of individuals who have earned a PhD, potentially engaging in a form of cyberbullying. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards those who use the 'Dr.' title. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.