In reply to:
Robert J Salvador
@RobertJSalvador
·
7d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
7d
The statement 'any with phase iii clinical validation?' is a relevant inquiry into the clinical validation of AI-driven cancer treatments, contributing to a discussion on the practical application and reliability of AI in medicine. It follows a conversation about the potential overvaluation of AI technologies and their economic impact.
- The statement is neutral and does not cause harm. It seeks factual information. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The inquiry promotes understanding by asking for specific validation data, which is crucial for informed discussions on AI in healthcare. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages constructively by focusing on evidence and validation rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.