Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 83

@AlfBob125020 timing was (slightly) off, because investors were slow to recognize reality, but my reasoning was exactly right: diminishing returns; too little reliability; too little too technical moat; too little profits.

11/25/2025, 2:56:05 PM

In reply to:

AlfBob

@AlfBob125020

@GaryMarcus You've been talking about the bubble popping for a year now... If you are so desperately trying to make it about your ego maybe find some more solid ground

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

👉 The bubble has begun to deflate.

👉 The jockeying for bailouts has begun.

👉 The government has begun to capitulate.

👉 GenAI was never reliable enough to make economic sense.

👉 All that talk about AGI 2027 was bullshit.

👉 Now the taxpayers are going to be left to clean

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

328d

The countdown until we are told that LLMs are “too big to fail” starts now.

“We can’t afford to lose to China”, they will say, accepting their multibillion dollar bailouts.

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the economic viability and sustainability of generative AI technologies, specifically addressing the concept of a 'bubble' in the industry. The tone is analytical and somewhat defensive, as the speaker is responding to criticism about their previous predictions. The intent is to justify their earlier stance on the issue by pointing out factors like diminishing returns and lack of profitability.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of opposing views, which might indirectly contribute to a polarized discourse.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by addressing the economic arguments rather than attacking individuals personally, although it does have a defensive tone. [+1]
Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
The statement does not acknowledge any mistakes, instead it reinforces the speaker's previous position, which could be seen as a lack of willingness to self-correct. [-1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement attempts to use influence to highlight perceived issues in the AI industry, which could contribute to public awareness and debate. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a public debate about a significant economic and technological issue, using the platform to discuss potential societal impacts. [+1]