In reply to:
The statement is a critical response to a news article about President Trump's proposal to extend ACA subsidies. It suggests a cycle of creating and solving problems for political gain, implying criticism of political strategies.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of political actions, which is a common aspect of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement is critical but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques a political strategy rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by critiquing a public policy issue, using the platform to engage in political discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.