In reply to:
The statement and conversation involve a discussion about perceived double standards in the AI research community, particularly regarding opinions on scaling and large language models (LLMs). The tone is somewhat critical and defensive, suggesting a perceived unfairness in how different researchers' opinions are received.
- The statement questions fairness, which can be seen as striving to address perceived harm in discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech, but it does imply criticism of others' actions. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is critical but does not engage in personal attacks, focusing instead on perceived inconsistencies. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.