The statement reflects a personal grievance about past criticism from notable figures and the broader community regarding the speaker's stance on artificial general intelligence (AGI). It suggests a vindication of the speaker's position and implies that previous criticisms were unwarranted. The tone is defensive and somewhat accusatory, focusing on past interactions rather than engaging in a broader public discourse about AGI.
- The statement does not directly harm others but carries a defensive tone that could perpetuate conflict rather than resolve it.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does call out individuals, which could be seen as lacking respect for their privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it focuses on past grievances and personal attacks, which violates the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.