Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the evolution of AI research and the need for new techniques beyond deep learning. It acknowledges past criticism and suggests a shift in the AI field, aligning with previous predictions.
- The statement does not cause harm and instead highlights a shift in AI research, which can be seen as constructive. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by discussing the need for new research directions in AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement could be seen as slightly dismissive of past criticism, but it does not engage in personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.