Jake Tapper

The statement critiques the New York Times' response to attacks on journalists, comparing it to their response to previous incidents involving Trump. It implies a pattern in the NYT's behavior, suggesting a quicker and more aggressive stance in this instance.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm but critiques the NYT's response strategy.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional behavior rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   Engages in constructive criticism by analyzing the NYT's response pattern without personal attacks. [+1]