DBIII 🇺🇸
@beam_donny
·
55d
The statement questions the transparency of social media platforms and suggests a lack of information about account sampling and VPN usage. It implies a need for congressional intervention to ensure transparency, hinting at potential manipulation by a public figure. The tone is skeptical and calls for accountability.
- The statement raises concerns about transparency, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for accountability. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by not disclosing personal information but questions the integrity of social media practices. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the need for transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning practices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.