The statement calls for transparency regarding the number of fake accounts on a social media platform, suggesting that the platform's owner is rewarding divisive behavior. It engages with public concerns about social media integrity and transparency, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies negative behavior by the platform owner, which could be seen as harmful if unfounded. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but questions the integrity of a public figure, which could impact their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes the platform owner without engaging in dialogue or providing evidence, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to question transparency, which is a responsible use of the platform, but lacks evidence to support its claims. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.