The statement critiques the growth of non-teaching staff in education, suggesting it represents bureaucratic inefficiency. It uses data to argue that bureaucracy hinders success, implying that resources may not be optimally allocated to improve educational outcomes.
- The statement indirectly suggests harm by implying inefficiency in resource allocation, but it does not directly harm individuals.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting a potential issue in education staffing, but it lacks empathy or compassion for those involved in non-teaching roles. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the education system, but it does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.