JK Rowling

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 31
12/1/2025, 2:48:43 PM
X
In reply to:
The Pissed Off Lawyer
@legaltweetz
·
67d
@jk_rowling Amen to that. AGP needs to be discussed and talked about. Not hidden. Nothing peaked me harder than learning about what it was and what it entails.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
67d
@legaltweetz AGP remains the elephant in the room we're all supposed to pretend is a hat stand.
The Pissed Off Lawyer
@legaltweetz
·
67d
@jk_rowling Once you see the fetish in it, you cannot unsee it.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
67d
@legaltweetz It's one of the very few debates where there's hardly any middle ground, other than general agreement that nobody should be persecuted for wanting to dress or look a certain way (within obvious limits. Thinking of that Canadian teacher with the enormous fake breasts. I am not
The Pissed Off Lawyer
@legaltweetz
·
67d
@jk_rowling I’ve crossed the rubicon against all of it. It’s the only way forward
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
67d
'He has a point, but he's too blunt.'

From the start, a key tactic of the gender identitarians has been linguistic prescription, and it's proved shockingly successful. Trans activists' shibboleths and euphemisms have been allowed to penetrate the upper echelons of our culture

The statement is part of a broader conversation about gender identity and single-sex spaces, which are significant public issues. The tone is personal and reflective, sharing a past conversation to illustrate a point about discomfort with certain gender identity policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but could contribute to a divisive discourse on gender identity.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy by not naming individuals but could be seen as indirectly contributing to a stigmatizing narrative. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without engaging with opposing perspectives. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but lacks constructive dialogue with those who disagree. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses free speech to express a personal viewpoint but could be more responsible by fostering a more inclusive discussion.