JK Rowling

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 31
12/1/2025, 2:58:39 PM
X
In reply to:
JohnAMeier
@John_A_Meier
·
67d
@jk_rowling @legaltweetz Autogynephiliac is another way of saying creep. I’m just gonna say creep.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
67d
@legaltweetz Years ago, I had a private conversation with a woman younger than me about the single sex space issue. She's very bright, well-educated, liberal, and absolutely could not understand why I wouldn't be comfortable undressing, or knowing my daughters were undressing, in front of a
The Pissed Off Lawyer
@legaltweetz
·
67d
@jk_rowling Amen to that. AGP needs to be discussed and talked about. Not hidden. Nothing peaked me harder than learning about what it was and what it entails.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
67d
@legaltweetz AGP remains the elephant in the room we're all supposed to pretend is a hat stand.
The Pissed Off Lawyer
@legaltweetz
·
67d
@jk_rowling Once you see the fetish in it, you cannot unsee it.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
67d
@legaltweetz It's one of the very few debates where there's hardly any middle ground, other than general agreement that nobody should be persecuted for wanting to dress or look a certain way (within obvious limits. Thinking of that Canadian teacher with the enormous fake breasts. I am not

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of autogynephilia and its relevance to discussions about single-sex spaces and gender identity. The tone is somewhat dismissive and potentially stigmatizing, as it labels a group of individuals in a derogatory manner. The intent appears to be to contribute to a debate on gender identity and public policy regarding single-sex spaces.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a term that could be considered harmful or stigmatizing, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of individuals it labels, potentially engaging in hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses a derogatory term without explanation or context. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a term that could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]