JK Rowling

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 31
12/1/2025, 9:15:03 PM
X
In reply to:
Christina Lee
@Christina_Lee04
路
67d
@jk_rowling @legaltweetz AGP is not included in the DSM, even under paraphilias & Transvestic Disorder--arousal from cross-dressing. But those with no MH degree love to conflate stuff & spout disinfo. 馃檮 Being transgender and/or dysphoric is a separate category and is NOT the same as cross-dressing.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
路
67d
@legaltweetz AGP remains the elephant in the room we're all supposed to pretend is a hat stand.
The Pissed Off Lawyer
@legaltweetz
路
67d
@jk_rowling Once you see the fetish in it, you cannot unsee it.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
路
67d
@legaltweetz It's one of the very few debates where there's hardly any middle ground, other than general agreement that nobody should be persecuted for wanting to dress or look a certain way (within obvious limits. Thinking of that Canadian teacher with the enormous fake breasts. I am not
The Pissed Off Lawyer
@legaltweetz
路
67d
@jk_rowling I鈥檝e crossed the rubicon against all of it. It鈥檚 the only way forward
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
路
67d
'He has a point, but he's too blunt.'

From the start, a key tactic of the gender identitarians has been linguistic prescription, and it's proved shockingly successful. Trans activists' shibboleths and euphemisms have been allowed to penetrate the upper echelons of our culture

The statement engages in a public discourse about the concept of autogynephilia (AGP) and its relation to transgender identity, referencing psychological terms and debates within the context of gender identity discussions. The tone is explanatory, aiming to clarify the definition of AGP and its distinction from transgender identity, as well as addressing misconceptions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to intentionally harm, but the sensitive nature of the topic requires careful consideration to avoid potential harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the topic is sensitive and could be perceived as stigmatizing if not handled with care.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to clarify a complex issue, which could promote understanding, but it lacks explicit empathy or compassion for those it discusses.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a factual explanation rather than personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the topic rather than individuals.聽[+1]