JK Rowling

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 31
12/1/2025, 9:43:53 PM
X
In reply to:
Liesl_
@_lliesl_
路
67d
@jk_rowling @CleverclogsNina @legaltweetz Indeed.
I was told to be "more understanding" of a middle aged man pretending to be a lesbian - by one of Scotland's elite 'human rights'/feminist class.
She clearly couldn't afford to let herself acknowledge these men exist.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
路
67d
@CleverclogsNina @legaltweetz It's already entered the room, but there remain people who simply refuse to see the elephant. Or they accuse you of having an irrational hatred of side tables because you've pointed out that one of them's got tusks and a trunk and is moving.
Nina Welsch
@CleverclogsNina
路
67d
@jk_rowling @legaltweetz This. I hold that if/when autogynophilia enters the chattering class lexicon, the madness really will disintegrate.

I鈥檝e predicted the same about previous dead-cert tipping points, mind 馃槳
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
路
67d
@legaltweetz AGP remains the elephant in the room we're all supposed to pretend is a hat stand.
The Pissed Off Lawyer
@legaltweetz
路
67d
@jk_rowling Once you see the fetish in it, you cannot unsee it.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
路
67d
@legaltweetz It's one of the very few debates where there's hardly any middle ground, other than general agreement that nobody should be persecuted for wanting to dress or look a certain way (within obvious limits. Thinking of that Canadian teacher with the enormous fake breasts. I am not

The statement engages in a contentious debate about gender identity and feminism, questioning the legitimacy of certain identities within feminist discourse. It uses a sarcastic tone to challenge the acceptance of cross-dressing men identifying as lesbians, implying a critique of current feminist and human rights perspectives.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses sarcasm and potentially harmful language, which could be seen as doing harm with words, thus violating this principle.聽[-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement could be interpreted as disrespectful towards individuals' identities, potentially engaging in hate speech, thus violating this principle.聽[-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses sarcasm to mock certain identities, violating this principle.聽[-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather uses sarcasm and mockery, violating this principle.聽[-2]