JK Rowling

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 31
12/1/2025, 9:48:10 PM
X
In reply to:
The Pissed Off Lawyer
@legaltweetz
·
67d
@jk_rowling @_lliesl_ @CleverclogsNina I can hear my feminist card being revoked as we speak for thinking that there’s no such thing as a “trans lesbian”
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
67d
@_lliesl_ @CleverclogsNina @legaltweetz Are you even a real feminist if you aren't supporting the right of cross-dressing straight men to call themselves lesbians?
Liesl_
@_lliesl_
·
67d
@jk_rowling @CleverclogsNina @legaltweetz Indeed.
I was told to be "more understanding" of a middle aged man pretending to be a lesbian - by one of Scotland's elite 'human rights'/feminist class.
She clearly couldn't afford to let herself acknowledge these men exist.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
67d
@CleverclogsNina @legaltweetz It's already entered the room, but there remain people who simply refuse to see the elephant. Or they accuse you of having an irrational hatred of side tables because you've pointed out that one of them's got tusks and a trunk and is moving.
Nina Welsch
@CleverclogsNina
·
67d
@jk_rowling @legaltweetz This. I hold that if/when autogynophilia enters the chattering class lexicon, the madness really will disintegrate.

I’ve predicted the same about previous dead-cert tipping points, mind 😪
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
67d
@legaltweetz AGP remains the elephant in the room we're all supposed to pretend is a hat stand.

The statement is a sarcastic remark aimed at individuals perceived to hold trans-exclusionary radical feminist (TERF) views. It engages in a contentious debate about gender identity and feminism, which is a public issue. The tone is mocking and dismissive, suggesting a lack of respect for differing opinions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses sarcasm in a way that could be considered harmful, as it mocks individuals for their views, potentially escalating conflict. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others and could be seen as engaging in cyberbullying by using derogatory language ('TERF Island'). [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses opposing views with sarcasm. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a personal attack through sarcasm. [-2]