The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of transparency in state-funded university curricula, a matter of public interest and policy. It supports the decision by the Florida education department to require professors to publicly post their syllabuses, suggesting that state-funded institutions should not conceal their educational content.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on transparency, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by advocating for transparency, which can lead to greater public awareness and engagement. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the policy issue rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for transparency, which can be seen as a contribution to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss a public policy issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.