Ron DeSantis

Rank 24 of 47

Score 14

@danielp_reid Right — you invest to maimoze returns for the beneficiaries. If a “green” company is actually a good investment then let ‘er rip. But don’t refuse to invest in non-PC companies even though it makes financial sense.

12/2/2025, 10:28:34 PM

In reply to:

Daniel Reid

@danielp_reid

41d

@RonDeSantis Well ESG was the premise that there were companies/sectors that deserved to be invested in because of their perceived social utility, no?

So it’s not that FL isn’t invested in “green” companies (just for being green), it’s that you’re invested in success, regardless its source?

Ron DeSantis

@RonDeSantis

41d

We banned ESG in our state pension fund.

Tale of Two Cities.

Marc Cocteaustan

@Igor_Cocteau

41d

@RonDeSantis Not Gavin

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the role of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) criteria in investment decisions. It argues for prioritizing financial returns over social or environmental considerations unless they align with profitability. The tone is pragmatic, focusing on financial outcomes rather than ethical considerations.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly harm but could be seen as dismissive of the potential positive impacts of ESG investments.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards the goals of ESG investing, focusing solely on financial returns. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of ESG investing, suggesting a focus on financial returns. [+1]