In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
65d
The statement involves public discourse as it addresses government transparency and accountability regarding unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). It questions the access to classified information and the responsibility of government officials to disclose such information to the public.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but raises concerns about transparency and accountability.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by questioning the lack of access to information and the need for disclosure. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the roles and responsibilities of government officials without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to advocate for government transparency and public awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.