In reply to:
Jack David
@FFS_WhatNow
·
61d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the contentious issue of child transition and the role of public figures in influencing public opinion on this matter. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that celebrities who supported child transition procedures are now attempting to distance themselves from their previous positions. The statement implies a lack of integrity among these celebrities and criticizes their past actions as harmful.
- The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words, as it uses accusatory language that could contribute to public shaming and harm the reputations of those it criticizes. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in a form of public shaming and implies that those who supported child transition procedures are deceitful or hypocritical. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a dismissive and accusatory tone rather than fostering understanding or discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.