JK Rowling

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 31
12/5/2025, 4:06:55 PM
X
In reply to:
Rachel Rooney
@RooneyRachel
·
61d
@jk_rowling @FFS_WhatNow
Rachel Rooney
@RooneyRachel
·
1214d
Many in children's publishing support & fundraise for #Mermaids.
Given the paedophilia links & other safeguarding breaches coming to light, perhaps they might want to reconsider??
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
61d
@FFS_WhatNow Celebrities who stampeded to cheerlead for experimental procedures on minors will find it extremely difficult to pretend they were inwardly sceptical all along, especially after rushing to smear as hateful and bigoted anyone questioning the evidence base for handing out puberty
Jack David
@FFS_WhatNow
·
61d
@jk_rowling The back peddling has already began.

"I never supported that."
"I always felt you had a point. It's just the way you made it."

Blah, blah, blah.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
61d
Every useful idiot who's used their platform to glamorise and normalise child transition, especially those with a young fanbase, should be made to read this horrifying article.

'One of the biggest revelations from the recordings is how these clinicians acknowledge performing

The conversation involves a critique of public figures and organizations supporting gender transition for minors, with a focus on accountability and skepticism about medical procedures. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a need for reconsideration of support for certain organizations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by using accusatory language and implying wrongdoing without detailed evidence. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of those it criticizes, potentially engaging in harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on blame rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, instead using a dismissive tone towards those with differing views. [-2]