European Commission
@EU_Commission
·
15d
The statement is a critique of the European Commission's actions against X (formerly Twitter) regarding compliance with transparency obligations. It accuses the EU Commission of engaging in censorship under the guise of content moderation and criticizes the demand for special access to data for researchers, framing it as a form of censorship-by-proxy.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language to criticize the EU Commission's actions, which could be seen as inflammatory.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does use accusatory language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses accusatory language, which could be seen as a personal attack on the EU Commission's motives. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by expressing a critical opinion on a public issue, but the tone could be more responsible and constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.