Michael Schellenberger

The statement questions the role of the U.S. in NATO, suggesting that European members are violating the NATO Treaty by undermining free speech and democracy. It implies skepticism about the U.S. defending Europe under these circumstances.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by suggesting that European countries are violating democratic principles, which might not be accurate or fair. [-1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a critical view without offering constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on accusations rather than fostering understanding. [-1]