Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -89
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
525d
Take a good look at this man. His intent is to censor the entire Internet, including in the United States. He hates our freedom because it exposes his lies. He treats “1984” as a guidebook. He is a totalitarian menace, and we must do everything we can to remove him from power.
12/5/2025, 5:37:22 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
Why are we in NATO if European NATO members are in direct violation of the NATO Treaty?

Why should Americans defend a continent that is in the process of killing free speech, democracy, and itself?
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
112d
German Chancellor @_FriedrichMerz is in violation of the NATO Charter for preventing @JoachimPaul_AfD
from running for mayor. FYI @realDonaldTrump @JDVance
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
TWITTER FILES - FRANCE reveals the birth of the censorship-by-NGO proxy strategy at the heart of the Censorship Industrial Complex:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
107d
🚨TWITTER FILES – FRANCE

At this moment, the Trump administration is negotiating with the EU over final obstacles to a trade deal, one of which is European censorship of US social media platforms.

Many analysts believe the massive size of the EU will lead US social media firms
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
You say it's not about censorship ("content moderation") but it is. You want to censor who gets verified. And you want X to give government-picked "researchers" special access to data so they can demand censorship. The Twitter Files revealed your censorship-by-proxy scam.
European Commission
@EU_Commission
·
14d
Today, we fined X for non-compliance with transparency obligations under the DSA.

We're holding X accountable for:
🔹Deceptive design of its ‘blue checkmark’
🔹Lack of transparency of its advertising repository
🔹Failure to provide access to public data for researchers

↓

The statement 'We were warned. @vonderleyen @EmmanuelMacron are bad actors.' is accusatory and lacks constructive engagement. It labels individuals as 'bad actors' without providing evidence or context, contributing to a negative tone.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially harm reputations without substantiated claims, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals mentioned, potentially engaging in defamation. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering division. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It lacks constructive criticism and resorts to personal attacks, failing to engage in meaningful dialogue. [-2]