Michael Schellenberger

The statement critiques European leaders for perceived hypocrisy in transparency and data access, suggesting a double standard in their demands for data from others while allegedly concealing their own financial dealings. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to highlight perceived inconsistencies in policy enforcement.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by accusing leaders of hypocrisy without providing evidence, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech but could be seen as disrespectful by making unsubstantiated claims. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism without constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it lacks evidence and context, potentially leading to personal attacks. [-1]