Jake Tapper

The statement critiques the claim that an IG report exonerates the SECDEF, arguing that the report shows a security breach that could endanger military operations. It raises concerns about national security and accountability.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight potential risks and accountability issues, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for security. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy but could be seen as accusatory, which might impact dignity if not substantiated.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of a public figure's actions, which is constructive if based on evidence, but could be seen as a personal attack if not.