Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques a news network's portrayal of events in Portland, suggesting that it provided a misleading narrative to the public. It references a ProPublica article that investigates the coverage and its potential impact on public perception.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by misleading news coverage, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, maintaining respect for privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By pointing out misleading information, the statement seeks to promote understanding and awareness, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the news network's coverage, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on the content of the coverage. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about potential misinformation, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing media coverage and encouraging informed public discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.