Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -109
12/6/2025, 3:27:34 PM
X
In reply to:
Trebor
@TreborJoss
·
10d
@shellenberger EU's privacy policies are all about protecting the government and those who are in it.
By controlling speech, they control who runs the government by hiding their actual intentions.
When they target X, it is not about X saying mean things or assigning blue checkmarks to the wrong
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
10d
The EU says it wants "transparency." In reality, its agenda requires secrecy. The EU demonizes the West for colonialism and climate change; it thus seeks to destroy it through de-industrialization and mass migration. Free speech on X stands in the way of civilization suicide.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
11d
Europe’s €140M fine on X isn’t censorship, it claims. But it is. Europe is pursuing the same censorship-by-proxy strategy used in the US from 2020 - 22. The reason is that free speech on X, particularly around mass migration, has exposed Europe’s civilizational suicide.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing EU privacy policies and their impact on free speech and governance. It suggests that these policies are a means of controlling speech and governance, implying a lack of transparency and potential censorship.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as harmful by suggesting malicious intent behind EU policies without substantial evidence, potentially inciting distrust. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of EU officials by attributing negative motives without clear evidence. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It does not engage in constructive criticism, instead making broad accusations without engaging in dialogue. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against EU policies, but it does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive. [-1]