Michael Schellenberger

The statement and its context engage in public discourse by discussing international relations, national security, and the dynamics between the U.S. and European countries. The conversation critiques European economic and military strength, questions the reliability of European allies, and addresses issues of censorship and free speech.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement raises concerns about European economic and military strength, which could be seen as a critique rather than a direct harm. However, it could potentially harm diplomatic relations. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy but could be seen as disrespectful to European nations by questioning their reliability as allies. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on negative aspects without offering solutions. [-1]